Mercedes-Benz C63 SE Performance Review: Turbo 4-Cylinder & Electric Motors
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
- Name
- By Dushyant
- (@dishs)
In this review by Savagegeese, the Mercedes-Benz C63 SE performance takes center stage, causing quite a stir with its departure from the traditional V8 to a turbocharged 4-cylinder engine coupled with electric motors. This bold move has divided opinions among enthusiasts, with many questioning if the car has lost its essence. However, the team delves deep into the technical intricacies behind this controversial decision, shedding light on the advanced technology and engineering prowess that Mercedes has poured into this new setup.
The exterior design of the C63 receives high praise for its classic muscle car aesthetic, standing out from competitors like the G Series M3 and M4. Inside, the car offers a mix of premium materials and comfort features, though usability concerns arise with the touch-based MBUX infotainment system. Despite being track-capable, the C63 leans more towards providing a luxurious driving experience, with spacious and adjustable seats but compromised trunk space due to the battery pack.
Transitioning to the technical aspects, the C63 sits on the M2 platform, boasting a rear-wheel drive setup and a wider track for enhanced performance. The car's weight, nearing 5,000 lb, is partially attributed to the battery pack, which contributes to a slightly rear-biased balance. The inclusion of rear steer and variable gear ratio steering systems adds a layer of nimbleness to the driving dynamics, showcasing Mercedes' commitment to pushing the boundaries of performance and handling.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch Mercedes C63 AMG | You Like 4 Cylinders? on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for Mercedes C63 AMG | You Like 4 Cylinders?
European regulations mixed with Chinese-focused interior design
Dislike of focus on 0-60 times over other driving elements
Preference for V8 engines in C Class AMG cars
Suggestions to name the model differently due to the 4-cylinder engine
Concerns about complexity and maintenance of the drivetrain
Criticism of the excessive screens in the car
Appreciation for the in-depth discussion and analysis in the video
Disappointment in the shift from V8 to 4-cylinder engine
Speculation on the future reliability and resale value of the car
Critique of the haptic controls and technological complexity of the vehicle
Related Articles
Polestar 3 Review: Luxury Electric SUV Performance and Efficiency Analysis
The Polestar 3, a high-performance electric SUV by Volvo's Polestar brand, offers luxury, tech-forward design, and impressive power. However, its efficiency and range fall short compared to competitors in the premium EV market.
2025 GR Corolla vs. VW Golf R: Performance and Interior Showdown
The blog compares the 2025 GR Corolla and VW Golf R, focusing on performance, interior features, and track capabilities. The Golf R excels with superior speed, power delivery, and body control, while the GR Corolla impresses with consistency and unique physical controls.
Nissan Armada Review: Robust Design, Luxurious Interior, and Superior Performance
Savagegeese reviews the Nissan Armada, highlighting its robust design, luxurious interior, powerful twin-turbo V6 engine, and superior ride quality. The Armada stands out for its practicality, safety features, and overall refinement in the competitive SUV market.
Mastering Brake Performance: Essex Brakes Experts Share Insights
Discover insights from Essex Brakes experts on the evolution of brake systems in street cars and racing, emphasizing technical aspects like consistent performance, temperature management, and component design. Gain knowledge on upgrading brake systems for optimal performance in modern vehicles.